OquiliaOquilia

Topic

SARFAESI Act news

The SARFAESI Act, 2002 lets banks enforce security on secured loans without going to court. Borrowers can appeal to the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

109 storiesLatest 14 Oct 2026, 17:09 IST

  1. Courts

    Can a State Relief Law Shield a Defaulting Company From Insolvency? Innoventive Industries Says No

    The Supreme Court's 2017 Innoventive Industries ruling held Section 238 of the IBC overrides state relief laws. Here is how the non-obstante clause, SARFAESI notices and DRT appeals actually work for borrowers.

  2. Courts

    Why a Personal Guarantor Is Not Off the Hook When the Company Gets an IBC Resolution Plan

    Approval of a company's IBC resolution plan does not discharge a personal guarantor. Lalit Kumar Jain (2021) keeps surety liability co-extensive. Defences, deposits and timelines.

  3. Courts

    When Is a Loan Too Old to Recover? Limitation, DRT Recovery Certificates and the IBC Section 7 Clock

    A loan default is not enforceable forever. After Kotak Mahindra Bank v A. Balakrishnan (2022), a DRT recovery certificate restarts the three-year limitation clock for Section 7 IBC.

  4. Courts

    Is Your Mortgaged Farm Safe? The Burden of Proof Behind the SARFAESI Agricultural-Land Exemption

    The SARFAESI agricultural-land exemption under Section 31(i) is not automatic: since the Supreme Court's K. Sreedhar ruling of 5 January 2023, the borrower must prove actual agricultural use.

  5. Courts

    Tenant Caught in a SARFAESI Auction: When a Lease Survives the Bank Taking Possession

    A lease can survive a bank's SARFAESI possession, but only on the timing. The Supreme Court's 2019 Bajarang Agarwal test, the Section 17 route, and the defences that work.

  6. Courts

    The Section 18 Trap: Why a Borrower Must Deposit Half the Debt to Appeal at the DRAT

    SARFAESI Section 18 makes a 50% pre-deposit mandatory before the DRAT hears a borrower's appeal. Narayan Chandra Ghosh v UCO Bank (2011) says it can drop to 25% but never be waived.

  7. Courts

    RBI Wilful Defaulter Rules: The Natural-Justice Steps a Lender Must Follow Before Tagging You

    RBI can brand you a wilful defaulter only above Rs 25 lakh, after an Identification Committee, a 21-day show-cause notice and a Review Committee hearing within six months of NPA. Your defences, explained.

  8. Courts

    Why NCLT Cannot Second-Guess Every Government Order Against a Company in Insolvency: The Embassy Property Ruling

    The Supreme Court's 2019 Embassy Property ruling holds that NCLT cannot review a government's sovereign decisions under the IBC - here is the forum map, procedure and borrower defences that follow.

  9. Courts

    Banks Cannot Charge Arbitrary Interest: What the RBI Interest Rate on Advances Direction Actually Requires

    The RBI Interest Rate on Advances Directions, 2016 bind every bank to a Board-approved pricing policy. Here is how borrowers contest an unjustified interest demand at the DRT under SARFAESI.

  10. Courts

    The 30-Day Clock: What Section 19 of the RDDB Act Requires When a Bank Sues You at the DRT

    When a bank sues you at the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Section 19(5) of the RDDB Act gives just 30 days to file your written statement, plus a 15-day extension. Here is the defence playbook.

  11. Courts

    Possession Through the Magistrate: SARFAESI Section 14 and the Affidavit Safeguards

    SARFAESI Section 14 lets a bank ask the District Magistrate to hand over a secured asset within 30 days, but only on a nine-point affidavit. Know the borrower defences and DRT timelines.

  12. Courts

    One-Time Settlements Formalised: RBI 2023 Framework on Compromise Settlements and Write-Offs

    The RBI's 8 June 2023 framework (RBI/2023-24/40) lets banks settle loans in cash with a sacrifice of dues. How it maps onto SARFAESI notices, DRT appeals and borrower defences.

  13. Courts

    Mardia Chemicals: How the Supreme Court Upheld SARFAESI but Struck Down the 75% Deposit

    On 8 April 2004 the Supreme Court upheld the SARFAESI Act but struck down the 75% pre-deposit under Section 17(2) as violative of Article 14. Here is what the ruling means for borrowers.

  14. Courts

    Appealing to the DRAT: The 50% Pre-Deposit Rule Under SARFAESI Section 18

    SARFAESI Section 18 gives 30 days to appeal a DRT order to the DRAT, but no appeal is entertained without a 50% pre-deposit of the debt due, reducible to 25% only for recorded reasons.

  15. Courts

    Fighting Possession: The Section 17 SARFAESI Application to the DRT Within 45 Days

    Section 17 gives a borrower 45 days to move the DRT against SARFAESI possession under Section 13(4). Here is the statutory footing, the procedure, the defences, and the case law.

  16. Courts

    Your Right to Object: SARFAESI Section 13(3A) and the Lender Duty to Reply Within 15 Days

    SARFAESI Section 13(3A) gives borrowers a statutory right to object to a demand notice and forces the lender to reply with reasons within 15 days. Here is how to use it.

  17. Courts

    The 60-Day Clock: How SARFAESI Section 13(2) Demand Notice Works and What Borrowers Can Do

    A SARFAESI Section 13(2) demand gives borrowers exactly 60 days once an account turns NPA. Here is the statutory position, the step-by-step procedure, and the defences at the DRT, DRAT and beyond.

  18. Courts

    Can You Still Redeem Your Mortgaged Property Before Auction? Celir LLP Narrows the SARFAESI Window

    The 2016 amendment to Section 13(8) of SARFAESI ends a borrower's right of redemption the day the Rule 9(1) auction notice is published. Celir LLP, decided 21 September 2023, confirms it.

  19. Courts

    Magistrate Handed Your Property to the Bank Under Section 14? Your Fight Belongs in the DRT, Not a Writ

    Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev (2011) holds that a Magistrate-assisted takeover under SARFAESI Section 14 must be challenged before the DRT under Section 17 within 45 days, not by writ.

  20. Courts

    Appealing a DRT Order to DRAT? Narayan Chandra Ghosh Makes the 50% Pre-Deposit Non-Negotiable

    Narayan Chandra Ghosh v UCO Bank makes the 50% pre-deposit for a DRAT appeal under SARFAESI Section 18 mandatory, reducible only to a 25% floor. The procedure, defences and timelines.

  21. Courts

    Bank Suing You in DRT and Seizing Assets Under SARFAESI at Once? Transcore Says That Is Legal

    Transcore v Union of India (2008) held banks may run a DRT recovery case and SARFAESI possession together. Here is the statutory basis and the borrower defences that still work.

  22. Courts

    Your 60-Day SARFAESI Notice: The Section 13(3A) Reply Right the Supreme Court Forced Banks to Honour

    A Section 13(2) SARFAESI notice gives 60 days - and since Mardia Chemicals (2004) a Section 13(3A) right to object and get written reasons before any Section 13(4) possession. Here is how to use it.

  23. Courts

    Section 14 IBC: The Moratorium That Freezes SARFAESI, Suits and Recovery Against a Company

    Once the NCLT admits a company into insolvency, Section 14 IBC declares a moratorium that statutorily freezes SARFAESI enforcement, DRT suits and asset recovery against the corporate debtor.

  24. Courts

    Section 96 IBC: How a Personal Guarantor Gets an Automatic Interim Moratorium the Moment an Application Is Filed

    Under Section 96 of the IBC 2016, a personal guarantor gets an automatic interim-moratorium on the filing date itself, freezing SARFAESI, DRT and cheque-bounce action before any hearing.

  25. Courts

    Section 31: The Assets SARFAESI Cannot Touch - Agricultural Land and Small Loans

    SARFAESI Section 31 keeps agricultural land and loans under Rs 1 lakh outside the Act. Here is the exact statute, the borrower defences and deadlines, and the 2023 Supreme Court proof test.

  26. Courts

    SARFAESI Section 14: When Banks Take Physical Possession Through the District Magistrate, and the 30-Day Rule

    How Section 14 SARFAESI lets a secured creditor obtain physical possession through the District Magistrate, the nine-declaration affidavit, the 30-day rule, and the borrower's Section 17 remedy.

  27. Courts

    Appealing a DRT Order Under Section 18: The 50% Pre-Deposit (Reducible to 25%) Explained

    A borrower's Section 18 SARFAESI appeal to the DRAT is barred without a 50% pre-deposit, reducible only to 25%. Here is the statute, the procedure, the defences and the leading Supreme Court ruling.

  28. Courts

    SARFAESI Section 13(8): How a Borrower Can Stop the Auction by Clearing Dues Before the Sale Notice

    Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act 2002, as substituted in 2016, lets a borrower halt an auction by tendering the full dues, but only before the sale notice is published. Here is the exact timeline.

  29. Courts

    Section 17: Filing Against the Bank at the DRT Within 45 Days - and the 60-Day Disposal Clock

    SARFAESI Section 17 lets a borrower challenge the bank at the DRT within 45 days of a Section 13(4) measure, with a 60-day disposal clock and no pre-deposit to file. Here is the full procedure.

  30. Courts

    Replying to a SARFAESI Notice: Your Section 13(3A) Right to Object and the Bank's 15-Day Duty to Answer

    Section 13(3A) SARFAESI gives borrowers a statutory right to object to a 13(2) demand notice and binds the bank to reply with reasons within 15 days. Here is how the reply cycle works and why you cannot appeal the rejection.

  31. Courts

    Section 14 Possession: The Sworn Affidavit a Bank Must File Before a Magistrate Can Hand Over Your Property

    Before a magistrate hands your property to a bank under SARFAESI Section 14, the authorised officer must swear a nine-point affidavit. Here is what it must say and how a defect lets you resist.

  32. Courts

    SARFAESI Section 13(2): The 60-Day Demand Notice a Bank Must Send Before Seizing Your Loan Security

    Before a bank can seize your mortgaged home or plot, Section 13(2) SARFAESI forces a 60-day demand notice after NPA classification. Here is exactly what that notice must contain and how it protects you.

  33. Courts

    Your Right to Object Under Section 13(3A) - and the Bank's 15-Day Duty to Give Reasons

    SARFAESI Section 13(3A) lets a borrower object to a Section 13(2) notice and forces the bank to give written reasons within 15 days. A silent or non-speaking reply is a documented lapse you can use at the DRT.

  34. Courts

    The 60-Day SARFAESI Notice: What Section 13(2) Actually Requires a Bank to Tell You

    Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act gives a defaulting borrower a 60-day demand notice, but only if the bank states the exact amount due and the secured assets. Here is how to read and challenge it.

  35. Courts

    RBI Guidelines on Recovery Agents: The Conduct Standards Banks Must Impose When Chasing a Loan Default

    RBI's Master Circular of 1 July 2010 binds banks to vet, identify and control the recovery agents chasing a loan default. Here are the conduct standards, the SARFAESI timeline and the borrower defences that follow.

  36. Courts

    RBI Fair Practices Code: The Rules That Bar Lenders From Harassment and Force Written Loan Terms on Borrowers

    The RBI Fair Practices Code (RBI/2015-16/16, 1 July 2015) forces NBFCs to furnish the loan agreement and bars harassment in recovery. Here are the rules, SARFAESI timelines and borrower defences.

  37. Courts

    Vidarbha Industries (2022): Does May in IBC Section 7(5)(a) Let the NCLT Refuse Admission Even When Default Is Proven?

    Vidarbha Industries (12 July 2022) read may in IBC Section 7(5)(a) as NCLT discretion to refuse a CIRP admission despite a proven Rs 1 crore default - and how 2023 narrowed it.

  38. Courts

    Is the SARFAESI Act Constitutional? What Mardia Chemicals Decided About Borrower Rights

    In Mardia Chemicals (2004), the Supreme Court upheld the SARFAESI Act 2002 but struck down the 75% pre-deposit for DRT appeals under Article 14. Here is what it means for borrowers.

  39. Courts

    ITC v Blue Coast Hotels (2018): The Bank's Duty to Give Reasons for Rejecting Your SARFAESI Section 13(3A) Representation

    The Supreme Court in ITC v Blue Coast Hotels (2018) held a bank's Section 13(3A) reasoned reply is mandatory - but non-compliance does not automatically void a SARFAESI sale where the borrower's own conduct is blameworthy.

  40. Courts

    Satyawati Tondon (2010): Why Borrowers Must Use the DRT Under SARFAESI Section 17 Before Rushing to the High Court

    Satyawati Tondon (2010) 8 SCC 110 bars borrowers from bypassing the DRT. Here is the SARFAESI Section 13, 17 and 18 ladder, the statutory clocks and the defences that survive.

  41. Courts

    How Mardia Chemicals (2004) Reshaped Borrower Rights Under SARFAESI: The Fall of the 75 Percent Pre-Deposit

    In Mardia Chemicals (2004) the Supreme Court upheld SARFAESI but struck down the 75 percent DRT pre-deposit under Article 14. A borrower's playbook on notices, Section 17 appeals and one-time settlements.

  42. Courts

    RBI Rules on Recovery Agents: What Banks and Collection Agents Are Barred From Doing to a Borrower

    RBI's Master Circular and the Supreme Court's Prakash Kaur judgement bar coercive loan recovery. Know the conduct rules, your grievance ladder, and the 45-day DRT appeal under SARFAESI Section 17.

  43. Courts

    DRT Can Undo a SARFAESI Sale: Ashok Saw Mill and the Tribunal Power to Restore Possession to a Borrower

    In Ashok Saw Mill (16 July 2009) the Supreme Court held a DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act can invalidate a bank's Section 13(4) action and restore possession to a borrower even after the sale.

  44. Courts

    Right of Redemption Under SARFAESI Section 13(8): When a Borrower Can Still Save the Mortgaged Asset

    The Supreme Court in Celir LLP v Bafna Motors (2023) fixed the SARFAESI Section 13(8) redemption deadline at the auction-notice date. Here is the statute, the procedure and the borrower defences that still work.

  45. Courts

    Mardia Chemicals: How Borrowers Challenge a SARFAESI Action at the DRT Without a 75% Pre-Deposit

    After Mardia Chemicals (Supreme Court, 8 April 2004) struck down the 75% pre-deposit, a borrower can challenge a SARFAESI action at the DRT under Section 17 within 45 days. Here is the full procedure and defences.

  46. Courts

    Why High Courts Turn Away SARFAESI Writs: Satyawati Tondon and the Duty to Use DRT First

    Satyawati Tondon (Supreme Court, 26 July 2010) bars routine writs against SARFAESI. Here is the Section 17 DRT route, the 45-day and Section 18 deposit rules, and where borrowers can still fight.

  47. Courts

    RBI's Rules on Loan Recovery Agents: The Harassment Limits Every Borrower Can Invoke

    RBI bars recovery-agent calls before 8am and after 7pm and the Supreme Court forbids forcible seizure. A borrower's guide to the harassment limits, SARFAESI timelines and DRT defences you can invoke.

  48. Courts

    Mardia Chemicals: The 2004 Ruling That Built Borrower Safeguards Into SARFAESI Section 13

    How the Supreme Court's 2004 Mardia Chemicals judgement scrapped SARFAESI's 75 per cent DRT deposit, forced a 15-day reasoned reply under Section 13(3A), and reshaped every borrower's defences.

  49. Courts

    What a DRT Can and Cannot Decide Under SARFAESI Section 17: The Prabha Jain Boundaries

    The Supreme Court in Prabha Jain (2025 INSC 95) fixed the limits of DRT power under SARFAESI Section 17 - what the tribunal decides, what goes to the civil court, and the 45-day and deposit rules borrowers must know.

  50. Courts

    Personal Guarantor Facing IBC Section 95? The Supreme Court Says You Must Be Heard First

    A personal guarantor's playbook on IBC Sections 95 to 100: the Jiwrajka judgement (2023 INSC 1018), the Section 100 right to be heard, and the SARFAESI and DRT clocks that run alongside.

  51. Courts

    M. Suresh Kumar Reddy v Canara Bank: Supreme Court Confines Vidarbha and Restores Near-Mandatory Section 7 Admission

    On 11 May 2023 the Supreme Court in M. Suresh Kumar Reddy v Canara Bank confined Vidarbha and held the NCLT has hardly any discretion to refuse a Section 7 IBC admission once a Rs 1 crore default is proven.

  52. Courts

    Mardia Chemicals v Union of India: The Judgment That Upheld SARFAESI but Struck the 75 Percent Deposit

    In Mardia Chemicals (2004), the Supreme Court upheld the SARFAESI Act 2002 but struck down the 75 percent pre-deposit for DRT appeals as violative of Article 14. Here is what it means today.

  53. Courts

    Vidarbha Industries v Axis Bank: The Case That Gave NCLT Discretion to Refuse Section 7 Admission Despite Default

    In Vidarbha Industries v Axis Bank (12 July 2022), the Supreme Court read "may" in Section 7(5)(a) IBC as tribunal discretion to decline a CIRP petition despite default. Here is what survives after 2023.

  54. Courts

    RBI Recovery-Agent Rulebook: The Conduct Limits That Bar Muscle Power and Odd-Hour Harassment of Borrowers

    RBI's recovery-agent rulebook bars odd-hour harassment and muscle power, makes the bank liable for its agents, and sits alongside SARFAESI's 60-day notice and DRT appeal rights. A borrower's defence playbook.

  55. Courts

    Mardia Chemicals: How the Supreme Court Killed the SARFAESI 75 Percent Pre-Deposit and Forced Lenders to Give Reasons

    On 8 April 2004 Mardia Chemicals struck down SARFAESI’s 75 percent DRT pre-deposit and forced lenders to give reasons under Section 13(3A). A borrower playbook for notices, DRT and DRAT appeals.

  56. Courts

    SBI v V. Ramakrishnan: The Section 14 IBC Moratorium Shields the Company, Not Your Personal Guarantee

    The Supreme Court held on 14 August 2018 that the Section 14 IBC moratorium protects only the corporate debtor. Here is where a personal guarantor stands, and the defences that still work.

  57. Courts

    Lalit Kumar Jain v Union of India: Why a Company Resolution Plan Does Not Wipe Out Your Personal Guarantee

    The Supreme Court's 21 May 2021 ruling in Lalit Kumar Jain confirms an approved corporate resolution plan does not discharge a personal guarantor. Here are the surviving liabilities, the Section 95 process, and the defences a borrower can still raise.

  58. Courts

    Harshad Sondagar: When a Lessee Can Halt a SARFAESI Section 14 Possession Order and Where to Appeal

    The Supreme Court's 2014 Harshad Sondagar ruling lets a lessee in possession halt a SARFAESI Section 14 order, but only with a registered lease. Here is the procedure, the defences, and where the appeal to the DRT lies.

  59. Courts

    RBI Fair Practices Code: The Recovery-Agent Conduct Limits a Defaulting Borrower Can Enforce

    The RBI Fair Practices Code of 1 July 2015 gives a defaulting borrower enforceable limits on recovery-agent conduct. Here are the SARFAESI timelines, DRT deposits and Supreme Court rulings that back them.

Showing the latest 60 of 109 stories. Browse the news archive