OquiliaOquilia
Legal

MP High Court grants bail in ED case linked to ex-transport constable Saurabh Sharma

The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail on grounds of parity to a company director accused by the ED of money laundering in a case linked to a retired transport constable.

Key points

  • The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail on 5 November 2026 to an accused in an ED money-laundering case, on the ground of parity.
  • The court set a personal bond of Rs 2 lakh each with two sureties; the applicant had been in custody since 10 February 2025.
  • Bail is not a finding on the charges; the trial before the Special Court (PMLA), Bhopal continues and the accused are presumed innocent.
Oquilia Newsroom
Financial news desk covering SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, and Budget-related developments.
2 min read · 361 wordsहिन्दी में पढ़ें
Verified SourcesSource: Madhya Pradesh High Court
A law library aisle between tall shelves of bound volumes

Photo: MaxnaCarta / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0 (cropped). Representational image.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur on 5 November 2026 granted bail, on the ground of parity, to Chetan Singh Gaur, a private co-accused and director of M/s Aviral Building Constructions Private Limited, and another applicant, in an Enforcement Directorate (ED) money-laundering case linked to Saurabh Sharma, a retired constable of the Transport Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh. The court said the Supreme Court had already granted bail to a co-accused.

What Happened

According to the order, the case rests on an FIR registered on 19 December 2024 by the Special Police Establishment of the Lokayukta Organisation, Bhopal, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which alleges that Saurabh Sharma amassed assets disproportionate to his income. The ED registered its money-laundering case on 21 December 2024. It alleges, as the order records, that properties acquired in the names of his family members, associates and companies are proceeds of crime, and that the company was used to launder them.

The prosecution complaint, as described in the order, alleges that a car registered in the applicant's name was found with cash and gold jewellery valued at about Rs 52 crore, seized by the Income Tax Department; the applicant told the ED he had no knowledge of it. He has been in custody since 10 February 2025, apart from a spell of temporary bail, and charges were framed on 10 April 2026.

His counsel argued that the High Court granted bail to Saurabh Sharma on 31 July 2026 and the Supreme Court granted bail on 1 September 2026 to Sharad Jaiswal, an accused and co-director of the same company, whose role was similar. The ED opposed bail, saying parity cannot be applied mechanically.

The court allowed bail on a personal bond of Rs 2 lakh each with two sureties, on condition that the applicants attend every date of the trial.

What It Means

Bail does not decide the charges. The trial continues before the Special Court (PMLA), Bhopal, and the order lapses if bail conditions are breached. These are allegations, not findings of guilt; the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court, and due process continues.

Source: High Court judgment

Sources & Citations

  1. High Court judgment — Madhya Pradesh High Court

This article was last reviewed on 9 November 2026 by Oquilia's editorial team. Every claim is sourced from primary regulatory materials (CBDT, IRDAI, RBI, SEBI, Indian Kanoon). View our methodology.

Found an error? Report an issue.