OquiliaOquilia
Legal

MP High Court orders AU Small Finance Bank to unfreeze account held over cyber complaint

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered AU Small Finance Bank to unfreeze a customer's savings account, keeping only the disputed Rs 18,300 aside in a fixed deposit.

Key points

  • The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore ordered AU Small Finance Bank on 29 October 2026 to unfreeze a customer's savings account.
  • Only the disputed Rs 18,300, linked to four entries, is to be kept in a fixed deposit, the court ordered.
  • If no magistrate passes an order within three months, the account holder may withdraw that amount too, the court said.
Oquilia Newsroom
Financial news desk covering SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, and Budget-related developments.
2 min read · 374 wordsहिन्दी में पढ़ें
Verified SourcesSource: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Steps under the guidelines the court applied: freeze only the disputed sum, here Rs 18,300 kept in a fixed deposit; bank uploads a grievance on the CFCFRMS portal within seven days; investigating officer decides within 15 days; bank releases, preferably within 48 hours.
Oquilia graphic. Source: Madhya Pradesh High Court order, 29 October 2026

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore on 29 October 2026 ordered AU Small Finance Bank to unfreeze a customer's savings account at its Ratlam branch that had been frozen after a cyber crime complaint. The court directed that only the disputed amount of Rs 18,300, covering four entries, be kept aside in a fixed deposit, and that the account holder be allowed to operate the rest of the account.

What Happened

The account holder went to the High Court asking for the freeze to be lifted, saying Rs 18,300 had been put on hold and the whole account restricted. The petition also pointed out that three identified transactions came to Rs 13,200.

The court applied two earlier rulings of the same High Court. In one, from 2024, banks were told to keep only the amounts named by cyber crime agencies in fixed deposits rather than block whole accounts. In the other, an order of 27 July 2026, a bench at Jabalpur framed guidelines based on a Standard Operating Procedure issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs on 10 April 2026. Under those guidelines, police should ordinarily ask banks to freeze only the disputed amount, freezing a whole account only in exceptional cases with written reasons.

The court held that the disputed Rs 18,300 may be released only after a competent Judicial Magistrate passes orders within three months. If that does not happen, the account holder may withdraw it too, after informing the police. The bank may act on any fresh complaint about other entries, keeping the SOP in mind.

What It Means

For a customer whose account is frozen over a cyber crime complaint, the ruling shows the court treating a freeze of the whole account as excessive where the disputed sum is small and identifiable. The guidelines the court applied make the bank the first point of contact: it must upload a grievance on the government's CFCFRMS portal within seven days, the investigating officer should decide within 15 days, and the bank should carry out a release, preferably within 48 hours.

Account holders should first raise a grievance with their bank under this procedure. Victims of cyber fraud can report it at https://cybercrime.gov.in or on helpline 1930.

Source: High Court judgment

Sources & Citations

  1. High Court judgment — Madhya Pradesh High Court

This article was last reviewed on 10 November 2026 by Oquilia's editorial team. Every claim is sourced from primary regulatory materials (CBDT, IRDAI, RBI, SEBI, Indian Kanoon). View our methodology.

Found an error? Report an issue.