OquiliaOquilia
Legal

Kerala HC: Federal Bank to lift account freeze if police do not name lien amount

The Kerala High Court on 4 November 2026 told Federal Bank to ask Bengaluru cyber police for the disputed amount in a frozen account, and to lift the freeze if they do not reply within a month.

Key points

  • The Kerala High Court directed Federal Bank to ask Bengaluru cyber police how much of a frozen account is disputed, within two weeks.
  • The police must reply within one month; if they do not, the bank must lift the freeze, subject to the account holder completing KYC.
  • If the police name the amount, the bank must confine the freeze to that sum and allow the rest of the account to be used.
Oquilia Newsroom
Financial news desk covering SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, and Budget-related developments.
2 min read · 378 wordsहिन्दी में पढ़ें
Verified SourcesSource: Kerala High Court
Four steps the Kerala High Court set for Federal Bank: write to the Bengaluru cyber crime police within two weeks, police to name the disputed amount within one month, lift the freeze if they do not, or limit it to the amount named.
Oquilia graphic. Source: Kerala High Court judgment, 4 November 2026

The Kerala High Court on 4 November 2026 directed Federal Bank to ask the Bengaluru cyber crime police how much money in a frozen account is actually disputed, and to lift the freeze if the police do not answer within a month. If the police name the amount, the freeze must be confined to that sum.

What Happened

An account holder at the bank's Kondotty branch in Malappuram asked the court to unfreeze the account. According to the order, the account holder is an accused in a case registered by the cyber crime police in Bengaluru under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019, and the case is under investigation. These are allegations, not findings of guilt; the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court, and due process continues.

A Bengaluru sessions court had earlier ordered the account to be unfrozen with only the disputed amount kept under lien, a hold on that sum. But neither that order nor the police requisition to the bank stated any amount, and the police did not appear before the High Court.

The court directed the bank to write to the police within two weeks of receiving the judgment, asking for the disputed amount. The police must reply within one month. If they do not, the bank must lift the freeze, subject to the account holder completing KYC. If they do, the bank must limit the freeze to that amount and allow the account to be operated, again subject to KYC. The bank may act on any future police requisition.

The court said the frozen amount must be dealt with under the 2026 standard operating procedure for custody and restoration of money in cyber-fraud cases reported on the national portal, and that the account holder may use the grievance mechanism in Clause 10 of that procedure.

What It Means

The order shows a court refusing to let an open-ended freeze run on when the police have never named an amount. It sets deadlines for both the bank and the police.

Victims of online fraud can report it at https://cybercrime.gov.in or on helpline 1930.

Source: High Court judgment

Sources & Citations

  1. High Court judgment — Kerala High Court

This article was last reviewed on 11 November 2026 by Oquilia's editorial team. Every claim is sourced from primary regulatory materials (CBDT, IRDAI, RBI, SEBI, Indian Kanoon). View our methodology.

Found an error? Report an issue.